I guess that’s a ‘glancing side-swipe’ as they say.
But I’ll tackle it head-on, it saves the dubious honour of having to answer non-related points. Whatis being made-up? Your position of ‘understanding’ or tea-and-sympathy is, to put it mildly, to take the wind out complaints that appear legitimate.
Factually, the game is not being worked in in any meaningful respect, and so any optimism for the future of it appear tobe wasted energy. A happy tone won’t help, any more than sad face. How about we just re-count the factual, and the chronological,and piece together what is available?
No-one needs to prove their level of disappointment (disappoint-instead-of-virtue signalling?) any more than they need to signal their happiness with the final result.
The guy was making a valid point. So why not let him? God knows there are few newer posters these days anyway…
The idea of wanting things 'to be worse than they already are 'is silly on two counts: A) First you’d have to go some (though good work has been doneto offset the awful release) and B) Who would waste time on that…? If you think I would, think again.
Also,does nothing serve as any sort of warning for SS3 and future projects? Not even a little bit?
Equally, it could all be thrown back in the opposite direction? Why defend the indefensible?
Somewhere along the line, it would be useful if those involved actually learned something, and that could be used in the future. Endless parsing only gets you so far.
(That is not aimed at Sam and the physical goods. How you can offset or defend this, I have no idea)